HomeUndergraduate and post graduate educational programs Educational program Дисциплина

Kazakh(Russian) Language

Asavbaeva Gulzada Baydrakhmanovna

Description: In the context of the implementation of state programs for trilingualism and spiritual renewal of national consciousness, it is intended for the development of the linguistic personality of the student, capable of carrying out cognitive and communicative activities in Russian in the areas of interpersonal and social communication. , professional, intercultural relations.

Amount of credits: 10

Пререквизиты:

Kazakh(Russian) Language
Казахский (русский) язык. Школьный курс

Course Workload:

Types of classes	hours
Lectures
Practical works	45
Laboratory works
SAWTG (Student Autonomous Work under Teacher Guidance)	30
SAW (Student autonomous work)	75
Abstract
Form of final control	Abstract
Final assessment method	Written exam. It consists of 3 blocks: 1 block-mini-test (10 min); 2 block - definition of terms (35 min) and 3 block-practical work with text (55 min). The duration of the exam is 1 hour 40 minutes. the examination material consists of 40% theoretical material and 60% practical material, if the final grade is higher than 50%, the student has passed the module.

Component: Mandatory component

Cycle: Secondary disciplines

Goal

successful mastery of types of speech activity according to the level of training; diversity of everyday,
socio-cultural, professional relationships; formation and improvement of language skills;
oral, depending on the communicative purpose and professional sphere of communication and the formation of writing skills.

Objective

1. correct choice and use of linguistic and speech means based on sufficient knowledge of vocabulary, grammatical knowledge system, pragmatic composition of expressing intention (intentions);
2. transfer of the actual content of the text, their conceptual information formation, conclusion of the entire text and its individual structural elements description of sections (pragmatic focus) ;
3. clarification of textual information in the scope of the requirements of certification of stylistic and genre features to the texts of communication in the socio-cultural, socio-political, official business and professional spheres;
4. request and report information in accordance with the terms of communication, evaluate the actions of participants, use information as a means of influencing the interlocutor in terms of cognition and communication in accordance with certification requirements;
5. to create programs of speech behavior in the conditions of personal, social and professional communication in accordance with the certification requirements of the peculiarities of language, culture, sphere of communication;
6. discuss ethical, cultural, socially significant issues in discussions, express your point of view, defend it with reasoned arguments, critically evaluate the opinion of interlocutors;
7. to express their personal intentions and needs (everyday, educational, social, cultural) to be able to participate in situations in various spheres of communication in order to present them ethically correct, meaningfully complete, lexico-grammatical and pragmatic;
8. the ability to compose everyday, socio-cultural, official business texts using lexical, grammatical and pragmatic material corresponding to a certain level of certification in accordance with generally accepted norms, functional orientation.

Learning outcome: knowledge and understanding

Knowledge of the laws of the functioning of the language system and understanding of the features of its speech embodiment.

Learning outcome: applying knowledge and understanding

interpret the information of the text, explain the style and genre specifics of the texts of the socio-cultural, socio-political, official business and professional spheres of communication;

Learning outcome: formation of judgments

request and communicate information in accordance with the situation of communication, evaluate the actions and deeds of participants, use information as a tool to influence the interlocutor;

Learning outcome: communicative abilities

build programs of speech behavior in situations of personal, social and professional communication in accordance with the norms of the language, culture, specifics of the sphere of communication;

Learning outcome: learning skills or learning abilities

participate in communication in various situations of different spheres of communication in order to realize their own intentions and needs, declaring them ethically correct, meaningfull.y complete, lexico-grammatically and pragmatically adequate to the situation

Teaching methods

problem learning: the creation of problem situations and the organization of active independent activity of students to resolve them, as a result of which there is a creative mastery of knowledge, skills, abilities, mental abilities develop;

technology of gaming methods (role-playing, business and other types of educational games): the development of cognitive activity, the formation of certain skills and abilities necessary in practical activities;

research methods: self-acquisition of knowledge through immersion in the problem under study and the search for ways to solve it.

Assessment of the student's knowledge

Teacher oversees various tasks related to ongoing assessment and determines students' current performance twice during each academic period. Ratings 1 and 2 are formulated based on the outcomes of this ongoing assessment. The student's learning achievements are assessed using a 100-point scale, and the final grades P1 and P2 are calculated as the average of their ongoing performance evaluations. The teacher evaluates the student's work throughout the academic period in alignment with the assignment submission schedule for the discipline. The assessment system may incorporate a mix of written and oral, group and individual formats.

Period	Type of task	Total
1 rating	мessage	0-100
	дискуссия
	essay
	presentation
	oral questioning
	written information
	Line control 1.
	essay
2 rating	presentation	0-100
	ntelligence- map
	presentation
	analysis communications
	internet resourcetaryn taldau
	oral questioning
	Frontier control
Total control	Abstract, Exam	0-100

The evaluating policy of learning outcomes by work type

Type of task	90-100	70-89	50-69	0-49
Type of task	Excellent	Good	Satisfactory	Unsatisfactory
The teacher follows academic standards of fair, transparent assessment of students based on established criteria. The assessment system provides every student with an equal opportunity to demonstrate their achievements, stimulate engagement, learning and progress in development.Fundamental components of assessment are providing students with rationales for assignments, explaining the content of the course material and its importance to the student in the context of the course learning outcomes. The volume and range of assessment tasks corresponds to learning outcomes.The assessment process is aimed at establishing differences in the levels of students' achievement of learning outcomes (according to assessment descriptors). Principles of assessment: - assessment must be valid, i.e. aimed at determining the student’s achievement of learning outcomes; - the assessment must be reliable, i.e. accurate and repeatable, with quality control procedures;- assessment must be transparent, i.e. information about it will be detailed and accessible; - assessment should be inclusive and fair, i.e. it should aim to provide all learners with the opportunity to demonstrate their achievements; - the assessment must be genuine, i.e. reflecting the potential conditions for the student’s future professional activity; - the assessment process should provide students with the opportunity to receive feedback.The teacher ensures that assessment criteria comply with the goals and objectives of the discipline; ensures the application of assessment criteria for assessing all types of educational activities of students, and also ensures preliminary familiarization of students with assessment criteria. The assessment process is a measurement of academic performance, for which appropriate measurement scales are used.	Demonstrates systematic theoretical knowledge, masters terminology, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, makes reasoned conclusions and generalizations, gives examples, shows fluency in monological speech and the ability to quickly respond to clarifications. relevant questions completed the practical work in full, observing the required sequence of actions; in the answer, correctly and accurately completes all entries and tables; performs error analysis correctly. When answering questions, correctly understands the essence of the question, gives an accurate definition and interpretation of the main concepts; accompanies the answer with new examples, knows how to apply knowledge in a new situation; can establish a connection between the material being studied and previously studied, as well as with material learned in the study of other disciplines	Demonstrates strong theoretical knowledge, masters terminology, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, makes reasoned conclusions and generalizations, gives examples, demonstrates fluency in monologue speech, but at the same time makes nonsense - errors that are corrected independently or with minor correction by the teacher fulfilled the requirements for a “5” rating, but there were 2-3 omissions. The student’s answer to the questions satisfies the basic requirements for an answer to 5, but is given without applying knowledge in a new situation, without using connections with previously studied material and material learned while studying other disciplines -plin; If one mistake or no more than two shortcomings are made, the student can correct them independently or with a little help from the teacher	Demonstrates shallow theoretical knowledge, shows poorly formed skills in analyzing phenomena and processes, insufficient ability to draw reasoned conclusions and give examples, shows insufficient fluency in monological speech, terminology, logic and consistency of presentation, makes mistakes that can only be corrected by correction by the teacher. did not complete the work completely, but not less than 50% of the volume of practical work, which allows you to obtain the correct results and conclusions; During the work, mistakes were made. When answering questions, the student correctly understands the essence of the question, but in the answer there are individual problems in mastering the course questions that do not prevent further mastery of the program material; no more than one gross mistake and two omissions were made.	Demonstrates systematic theoretical knowledge, masters terminology, logically and consistently explains the essence of phenomena and processes, makes reasoned conclusions and generalizations, gives examples, shows fluency in monological speech and the ability to quickly respond to clarifications. relevant questions completed the practical work in full, observing the required sequence of actions; in the answer, correctly and accurately completes all entries and tables; performs error analysis correctly. When answering questions, correctly understands the essence of the question, gives an accurate definition and interpretation of the main concepts; accompanies the answer with new examples, knows how to apply knowledge in a new situation; can establish a connection between the material being studied and previously studied, as well as with material learned in the study of other disciplines

Evaluation form

The student's final grade in the course is calculated on a 100 point grading scale, it includes:

40% of the examination result;
60% of current control result.

The final grade is calculated by the formula:

FG = 0,6	MT₁+MT₂	+0,4E
	2

Where Midterm 1, Midterm 2are digital equivalents of the grades of Midterm 1 and 2;

E is a digital equivalent of the exam grade.

Final alphabetical grade and its equivalent in points:

The letter grading system for students' academic achievements, corresponding to the numerical equivalent on a four-point scale:

Alphabetical grade	Numerical value	Points (%)	Traditional grade
A	4.0	95-100	Excellent
A-	3.67	90-94	Excellent
B+	3.33	85-89	Good
B	3.0	80-84
B-	2.67	75-79
C+	2.33	70-74
C	2.0	65-69	Satisfactory
C-	1.67	60-64
D+	1.33	55-59
D	1.0	50-54
FX	0.5	25-49	Unsatisfactory
F	0	0-24	Unsatisfactory

Topics of practical classes

Russian language in the modern world, Kazakhstan
Problems of the modern family (problems of fathers and children, the role of women and men)
Lifestyle (peculiarities of work, leisure, communication, range of interests)
Lifestyle (clothes, design and functionality of the home)
Cultural recreation: theaters, museums, festivals, exhibitions, concerts, literature, music
State and religious holidays in the Republic of Kazakhstan
The geographical position of the city
History of the city: foundation, historical events
The main problems of the city: living wage, problems of housing, transport
Ideal city
At the airport, at the train station
Health problems in the country
The main occupations of the population: agriculture, public service, private business
The problem of urbanization of the population

Key reading

Глазкова, М. М. Стилистика русского языка: учебник / М. М. Глазкова, О. Н. Морозова. — Москва: Ай Пи Ар Медиа, 2024. — 409 c. — ISBN 978-5-4497-2586-8. — Текст: электронный // Цифровой образовательный ресурс IPR SMART: [сайт]. — URL: https://www.iprbookshop.ru/135265.html (дата обращения: 22.04.2024). — Режим доступа: для авторизир. пользователей. - DOI: https://doi.org/10.23682/135265
Корнев, В. А. Русский язык в речевом аспекте: учебник для иностранных учащихся / В. А. Корнев, Л. С. Кателина, О. М. Дедова. — Москва: Ай Пи Ар Медиа, 2021. — 412 c. — ISBN 978-5-4497-1324-7. — Текст: электронный // Цифровой образовательный ресурс IPR SMART: [сайт]. — URL: https://www.iprbookshop.ru/110123.html (дата обращения: 22.04.2024). — Режим доступа: для авторизир. пользователей. - DOI: https://doi.org/10.23682/110123
Токарев, Г. В. Современный русский литературный язык: лексикология: учебник / Г. В. Токарев. — Тула: Тульский государственный педагогический университет имени Л.Н. Толстого, 2021. — 133 c. — ISBN 978-5-6047371-0-1. — Текст: электронный // Цифровой образовательный ресурс IPR SMART: [сайт]. — URL: https://www.iprbookshop.ru/119694.html (дата обращения: 22.04.2024). — Режим доступа: для авторизир. Пользователей
Лёвина, Г. М. А1. Русский язык для начинающих (Russian for beginners): учебник / Г. М. Лёвина, Е. Ю. Николенко. — Саратов: Ай Пи Ар Медиа, 2019. — 164 c. — ISBN 978-5-4497-0047-6. — Текст: электронный // Цифровой образовательный ресурс IPR SMART: [сайт]. — URL: https://www.iprbookshop.ru/80592.html (дата обращения: 22.04.2024). — Режим доступа: для авторизир. пользователей. - DOI: https://doi.org/10.23682/80592
Рогачева, Е. Н. Русский язык как иностранный. Вводно-грамматический курс. Часть 2. Базовый уровень: учебник / Е. Н. Рогачева. — Саратов: Вузовское образование, 2015. — 353 c. — Текст: электронный // Цифровой образовательный ресурс IPR SMART: [сайт]. — URL: https://www.iprbookshop.ru/30550.html (дата обращения: 22.04.2024). — Режим доступа: для авторизир. Пользователей
Рогачева, Е. Н. Русский язык как иностранный. Вводно-грамматический курс. Часть 1: учебник / Е. Н. Рогачева, В. В. Чудинина. — Саратов: Вузовское образование, 2013. — 423 c. — Текст: электронный // Цифровой образовательный ресурс IPR SMART: [сайт]. — URL: https://www.iprbookshop.ru/11293.html (дата обращения: 22.04.2024). — Режим доступа: для авторизир. пользователей.

June 12, 2023 - National mourning day in the Republic of Kazakhstan